Finding / 2026-07 to 2026-08 / uk

GEO strategy should start with category structure

August visibility ranged from entrenched multi-brand leadership in accounting to a fragmented cybersecurity field.

Published
2026-09-02
Revised
2026-09-02
Author
Cleotic Research
Method
comparison-v1.1
97.9%

Intuit visibility in accounting

Denominator: 2,371 successful sector responses

90.8%

Octopus Energy visibility

Denominator: 2,375 successful sector responses

30.2%

Darktrace visibility in cybersecurity

Denominator: 3,528 successful sector responses

The room to win differs sharply by category

Accounting had three tracked brands above 92% visibility. Cybersecurity had no tracked brand above 31%. A single generic GEO benchmark would hide that difference in competitive structure.

Cybersecurity

01 Darktrace30.2%
02 Entrust29.3%
03 CrowdStrike23.0%

3,528 successful responses

Energy and home

01 Octopus Energy90.8%
02 British Gas50.9%
03 EDF Energy31.2%

2,375 successful responses

Fintech

01 Starling Bank53.3%
02 Revolut44.5%
03 Monzo43.2%

2,940 successful responses

Insurance

01 Direct Line45.6%
02 ManyPets31.2%
03 Cuvva29.9%

2,532 successful responses

Legal tech

01 Luminance43.9%
02 Ironclad38.1%
03 DocuSign33.6%

2,380 successful responses

SME accounting

01 Intuit97.9%
02 FreeAgent94.0%
03 Xero92.9%

2,371 successful responses

United Kingdom / August 2026 / Denominator: Successful responses from the four continuously observed model surfaces within each sector / Method: comparison-v1.1

View chart data as a table
SectorLeading tracked brandVisibilitySecondVisibilityThirdVisibility
CybersecurityDarktrace30.2%Entrust29.3%CrowdStrike23.0%
Energy and homeOctopus Energy90.8%British Gas50.9%EDF Energy31.2%
FintechStarling Bank53.3%Revolut44.5%Monzo43.2%
InsuranceDirect Line45.6%ManyPets31.2%Cuvva29.9%
Legal techLuminance43.9%Ironclad38.1%DocuSign33.6%
SME accountingIntuit97.9%FreeAgent94.0%Xero92.9%

The same visibility score means different things in different markets

Accounting was highly concentrated in August. Intuit appeared in 97.9% of retained responses, FreeAgent in 94.0% and Xero in 92.9%. Energy and home also had a clear leader, with Octopus Energy at 90.8%.

Cybersecurity was more fragmented. Darktrace led at 30.2%, followed by Entrust at 29.3% and CrowdStrike at 23.0%. Insurance and legal tech also showed more room between the leaders and the ceiling than accounting did.

Challenger and leader programmes need different scorecards

In a concentrated category, a challenger is trying to displace names that appear almost by default in the selected prompt set. Comparative evidence, clear differentiation and credibility for a narrow use case matter more than a generic ambition to be visible.

In a fragmented category, the opportunity may be to strengthen category association across a wider set of prompts. Leaders still need defensive monitoring because a high overall position can hide model or prompt pockets where the brand is absent.

What marketers should do

  1. 01Benchmark against the structure of the relevant category, not the whole index.
  2. 02Give challengers a narrow displacement target tied to a use case or criterion.
  3. 03Give leaders a defensive coverage target across models and prompt clusters.
  4. 04Revisit the category map monthly before changing targets.